We have spent a lot of time in the last month discussing how to protect one's portfolio from a market crash. There are some who don't think the market will crash and that November 20th started a new bull market. There is a whole range of opinions out there from bull market to financial Armageddon.
For the sake of being cautious I think we all need to take the issue of hedging and portfolio protection seriously. I have chosen the least popular way among those voting in the poll to protect one's portfolio. I use protective index puts.
The results are as follows for the question "How are you predominantly protecting your portfolio?":
1) Collecting a lot of option premium - 32%
2) Nothing. I'm letting it fly! - 22%
3) Sitting mostly in cash - 20%
4) Setting tight stops - 9%
4) Hedging with ultra shorts - 9%
6) Hedging with protective puts - 6%
Collecting a lot of option premium - The top choice didn't work in 2008. While option sellers had a lower cost basis than stock holders they still got slaughtered. Check the results of some very good covered call writers whom I respect. They can be found on my blog roll. On average they lost 20% plus which was way better than the market but devastating nonetheless and more importantly, avoidable.
Nothing. I'm letting it fly! - I was surprised this response came in second. If this is in fact a new bull market these traders will participate in it to the fullest. They will have most of their capital in the market and they won't have spent money on hedges. More power to them but too risky for my appetite.
Sitting mostly in cash - It's hard to argue with this response. It's effective. This doesn't work for me because I want to put capital to work and am not content waiting around for things to get better. Perhaps they are picking their spots to trade very infrequently. I would rather enter a high number of very conservative trades which have above average returns due to the high option premium. I just don't want to enter these trades and not be protected.
Tight stops - It's hard to argue with this strategy as well. The problem I have with this strategy is the gap up or down premarket or after hours. Perhaps this is an issue I have with my broker TD Ameritrade and other brokers will honor stops premarket or after hours. Another issue is that this method is more effective for daytraders, momentum and swing traders. For the option seller who has time decay on her side, not as much. The underlying stock can go down a little and with very conservative trades, down a lot and the option writer still wins. Tight stops would yank us out of many profitable trades too early in the game in my opinion.
Hedging with ultra shorts - This strategy works if you trade the ultra short ETF's short term. If you hold these things the returns are disappointing even if you are right about market direction. They are calculated daily in a wacky way. There has been so much discussion about this on the web that there is no need to go into more detail here. I'll take this strategy over "Nothing. I'm letting it fly!" but that's just me.
Hedging with protective puts - My method of portfolio protection came in last place. So much for fancying myself persuasive. Protective puts can be bought and held more effectively than ultra shorts. The downside is time decay. The upside is that you can buy them as far out as you want although they are more expensive. I buy protective index puts on the exchanges where most of the trades in the account can be found. I'm willing to take 25% of the premium collected and buy this insurance. The options I'm selling are jacked up more than 25% above normal due to unusual market volatility so it's a wash in my book. It is an art and for me a continuing work in progress to figure out how many puts to buy and at what strike price and month. Since I've been writing puts so far out of the money I feel comfortable buying index puts that are far out of the money as well since the market would have to tank really bad before I get hurt. These index puts are far less expensive.
Can a lot of money still be made when one enters very conservative trades selling puts way out of the money while also paying for portfolio protection? I believe so. First of all the premiums are high due to speculation, market volatility and hedging. Second, if one uses leverage the margin maintenance requirements are extremely low on way out of the money puts. One needs to only set aside 10-12% of the cost of the stock if put to her. This jacks up the return on margin. I don't think the use of leverage in this instance is risky due to the very conservative nature of the underlying trades and if enough protective puts are bought. Bottom line: if you use leverage you can make very conservative trades, protect the portfolio and safely make a lot of money...and that's the idea, isn't it?